Don’t ask me. I only know that Wayne Lapierre’s NRA vision of armed guards on every corner is a bad idea as I argued in my previous post. Trying to digest all the elements involved in reducing gun violence makes me feel sick. It is like trying to eat a huge meal when you are not even hungry.
Only one thing seems clear. We have two fundamentally different approaches to reducing gun violence. One represented by the President relies primarily on background checks, research on gun violence and gun restrictions. The other represented by the NRA’s Lapierre relies on more guns and less restrictions on their availability. I think of it as a return to the wild west. I know, these more guns are supposed to be in the hands of “good guys,” but since Lapierre is against background checks, how would we have a clue who is who?
The NRA has quietly been winning this battle of beliefs for a couple of decades – prior to the Sandy Hook massacre polls showed an American inclination for less gun control not more – and without the uniquely powerful reaction most of us had to six and seven year olds riddled with bullets that day, we wouldn’t be having this discussion now.
The NRA has successfully worked for years nationwide like termites in the wood work to push their “free the guns” agenda in state governments, city councils and of course Congress. From this perspective one can see why they accuse Obama of offering a “radical” response to this recent tragedy. It is radical to them because it opposes all the gains they have made in the opposite direction.
Right wingers like Rand Paul are saying Obama has a “king complex” after he issued numerous executive orders related to gun violence the other day. One of the king’s decrees was the radical step of authorizing the Center for Disease Prevention to do research in this area again, including the impact of video games and violent images, which I imagine Rand Paul would like if the research was restricted only to the last two topics. And Obama hadn’t suggested it.
Back in 1996, the NRA managed to marshal enough congressional support to forbid the CDC from doing any more studies on gun violence. Apparently they did not welcome studies with conclusions like this: “Homes with guns had a nearly three times greater risk of homicide and a nearly five times greater risk of suicide than those without, according to a 1993 study in the New England Journal of Medicine.” (Slate).
Another example of the NRA termites at work is a 2005 Florida law that expanded the right of self-defense, beyond a person’s home as described in the Washington Post. No longer was it only acceptable to kill an intruder in your home, but anyone who intruded in your space anywhere. “A part of the law, the “stand your ground” provision, gained national attention after the 2012 fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed teenager.” Soon after the law’s passage, the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council adopted the Florida bill as a model for other states. ” Since then, about two dozen have passed a version.”
In short, while the NRA acts like President Obama has declared war on gun owners, in reality he is finally mounting a defense of common sense gun laws steadily eaten away by the NRA for years.
Sandy Hook changed all that as I asserted in a previous post. There is a deeper passion in more people to find ways to reduce gun violence than before, and not along the lines of the right wing vision of a return to the wild west. However, the NRA has their own passion as well as money and organization. As that Washington Post article states: “With an e-mail alert system designed to target its 4.2 million members, the NRA can mobilize hundreds of gun owners in every community on short notice to turn out at a committee hearing or a city council meeting.”
The NRA has staunchly and steadfastly defended their positions. This is not a battle easily won, but a war that will be fought over time. It remains to be seen whether the spirit of Sandy Hook will prove equal to that of those who feel any kind of restrictions on what they deem their gun rights is a mortal sin.