(This is another long one folks, so you might want to grab a drink or postpone it until you’ve whipped through your other emails. I will try to get back to shorter posts, but the omnipresent Trump is tough to nail in a few words.)
The Trump show has basically remained the same as when he was a candidate, but now his tweets go beyond a campaign tactic. Now they impact our foreign policy, but who knows just how much, as those tweets raise many questions but provide few answers. This point was made in a Chinese newspaper earlier this month. It indicated Trump’s tweets about serious matters are “impossible to fathom”, so it is better to pay close attention to his actions, not his words.
I’m happy that the Chinese government seems to understand that, figure Vladimir Putin understands it even better and hope the rest of the world follows suit. It is bizarre to say to the world that they shouldn’t take many of our president’s tweets seriously, but that is where we are.
Tweets, by nature, are very short and not usually well thought out, which often leaves more room for ambiguity than most forms of communication. That’s perfect for Trump, as the ambiguity in controversial tweets provide tons of speculative fodder for the press.
Part of the ambiguity lies in the limitation to 140 characters, but with Trump, maybe a good share of that lack of clarity is intentional. The more provocative and ambiguous a tweet seems the more it prods the TV chattering class to dissect and speculate it ad nauseam, which then prompts his word handlers to walk the statements back which then gives the pundits further fodder to digest, until some new provocative statement over shadows the last one.
The effect is to make Trump the center of our attention most of the time. What more could a supreme narcissist want?
A typical example is the kerfuffle spawned by Trump’s tweeting last Friday about the need to “expand our nuclear capability.” That seemed to come out of the blue unless you realized Vladimir Putin spoke about strengthening the Russian nuclear capability last Thursday. The important nuance here (for those who still care about such things) is that Putin seemed to be talking about modernizing his force, not actually expanding it in terms of war heads.
Trump either saw that as a challenge, or just an opportunity to reinforce his tough guy image by shadow boxing with this buddy Vlad, knowing that Putin wouldn’t get up in arms, so to speak. Hey, as many have noted, they have a bromance going
The press interpreted Trump’s words as a call to grow our nuclear arsenal, just the opposite of American policy for decades, but his word whizzards denied that. What he meant, they said, was to strengthen and update our nuclear capability, not expand it in size. Actually Obama has had a plan in place since last January to do just that, but of course Trump always ignores whatever facts fail to support the point of his story.
The next morning, to keep us all on pins and needles and remind us of his boldness, Trump ignores his spinners and doubles down on the possibility of nuclear expansion, not just modernization, in a phone conversation with a morning talk show host: “Let it be an arms race, we will outmatch them at every pass.”
Who knows what he meant by that, even him? I’m not even sure who the “them” is. Surely, not his bro-buddy, Vlad, who later that day asserted he certainly didn’t want a renewed arms race. And today I hear that Putin has invited the children of American diplomats to a big Christmas/New Year’s party normally reserved for Russians.
Certainly Uncle Vlad wouldn’t be rattling the nukes.
But of course the TV press goes into a frenzy about reversing decades of nuclear policy, just as Trump wants. Once getting the issue to a boiling point, our president-elect decided to turn it down to simmer later Friday. He unveiled a letter received a week ago from Vlad congratulating him on his election victory (a hug to you buddy).
Then later still on Friday Trump pointed to a tweet from Putin criticizing Hillary for bad sportsmanship. Wrote Putin: “In my opinion, it is humiliating. One must be able to lose with dignity.”…….(this from a world class thug)
“So true!” responded Trump, making that earlier talk of an arms race seem what it was, a playful tug on the marionette strings of the press.
I have bothered to break down a Trump induced frenzy of non-news because I think we will get a lot of this sort of nonsense over the next few years and we’ll all have to handle it the best we can. It is of little use to parse his words unless those words tie to actions, which at the moment are largely a matter of the selection of his governing team.
Foreign policy feints through off hand tweets? That is the way Trump has set up his show and our media keep distributing tickets while many of the rest of us watch the performances. Even if we don’t watch them, we hear about them. Those damn little tweets remind me of the West Nile Virus.
P. S. – The “arms race” incident I referred to includes several interesting aspects succinctly described in an article in the The Week written by Peter Weber, including a short video of foreign policy expert David Ignatius. Ignatius suggests there may be some value in Trump’s disruptive moves, but adds that value would depend on a vision and discipline that Trump has yet to display.