We have a president elect who has been able throughout the campaign to by and large getaway with creating a reality in a shape that was useful to him at the moment. And now we have an intelligence community that doesn’t do that. It creates a reality based on their best understanding of the facts at the moment. And those two mind sets are now clashing right in front of us as we run up to the inauguration.
General Michael Hayden, former CIA Director, on Smerconish show January 7
Those two mind sets clashed yesterday, not with all sorts of fireworks but with a clear display of separate realities as to the main points of the report those intel chiefs delivered to Trump. I made some predictions in a post yesterday as to what might transpire. While I think I was in the ballpark, I missed the chance to hit a home run, not foreseeing the big fat possibility that Trump would cherry pick a bit here and there from the report while misrepresenting its main substance. In other words he would publicly interpret the report in a way that fit his separate reality.
The reality of the report was that Russian hacking is a big problem and that it interfered with our election in various ways with a few aims in mind, one of them to reduce the chances of Hillary Clinton winning. That is an unwelcome reality for Trump because he will not accept any news that might de-legitimize his victory to any degree nor any information that detracts from his desire to develop a closer relationship with Russia.
I should have realized that Trump might just ignore, or misrepresent the findings of the report as he has done so many times in the past with information that doesn’t suit him. In other words, work it into his separate reality. I thought he would back off a bit as long as the report did not conclude that the Russians actions helped him win, as he knew it did not, because the intelligence chiefs don’t believe that’s their call.
But in simply discussing Russian efforts to make an impact it raises the possibility that some of those attempts did influence a number of voters who didn’t care for either candidate much, but felt the duty to vote anyway. Though impossible to know how much of an impact, it seems unlikely to have had no impact at all, which is what Trump insists on claiming. Even worse, he acts as if the report backs him up.
Here is the beginning of the official response of Trump to the findings of the intel services: “While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines.”
That is a textbook case of disinformation as defined in Wikipedia: “Disinformation is intentionally false or misleading information that is spread in a calculated way to deceive target audiences.” For one, as Michael Hayden pointed out, the initial part focusses on a cyber problem we have with several nations, which is true, but it wasn’t the focus of the report. The problem with Russia was the focus of the report and that is obscured here.
After beginning with that misleading statement, the Trump team jumps to “there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election”……as if that has anything to do with the initial comments on the general cyber problem or that the intel report concluded that. Neither is true. The intel report concluded nothing as to the impact. Instead it leaves it to us to form our own opinion from their information.
The “no impact” comment is just made up, a fact hidden by connecting the words to the statement about no tampering with the voting machines, which is actually in the report.
Perhaps this break down is tedious to you, but the Trump team is so good at spreading disinformation that a light needs to be continually cast on instances of them doing just that. Especially on a topic as important as our relationship to Putin’s Russia.
Over these next two or three weeks this war between separate realities could heat up, as there are several Republican senators who I believe will resist Trump’s continuous attempts to trivialize Russian actions of interference in our political process.