While I still think Stephanie Clifford is much more honest than Donald Trump (a low bar I know), her lawyer, Michael Avennati, undermined the power of that contrast by trying to get too cute regarding the 60 Minutes interview with Clifford yesterday.
Last week he popped up everywhere on politics TV, teasing out all sorts of possibilities of what Stormy would reveal Sunday, implying hard evidence would be displayed. It turned out no hard evidence was produced and the only thing significantly new was her assertion that a man physically threatened her in a parking garage if she didn’t shut up about Trump. No proof was given, so how do we know she didn’t make that up?
In the court of public opinion it comes down to whether you tend to believe her or not. Does she deserve credit for standing up to Trump, or is she just playing us a long as Trump regularly tries to do.
I feel played and I feel pissed.
You can’t project yourself as a truth teller and then offer no proof and/or little in the way of new information, especially after hyping the appearance for days.
Being known as a “porn star” provides a couple of strikes against Clifford’s character to begin with. Implying goods would be revealed and then holding them back Sunday further diminishes trust in her and her arguments.
I don’t want to hear anything more from either of them unless it is accompanied with the hard evidence they keep implying they have.