The attack on Syria Friday seemed flawless and there doesn’t look like there will be strong repercussions from the Russians or Syria’s President Assad. But the major reason for a lack of a big response was the strike was limited to chemical weapons production and storage structures, while giving Assad and his friends plenty of notice (beginning with Trump’s tweeted threats a week ago), so the Russians and Assad could move their troops and who knows what else out of the way of the most likely targets.
From what I’ve seen reported, amazingly no one was killed and only a handful injured. That’s great, but when your destructive skill is so surgical as to leave not much of a scar, it gives me no cause to believe a U. S. government spokesman who expressed hope these actions would somehow draw Putin, Assad and the Iranians to some form of international negotiations.
What would they have to gain? They have already won. Other than a sizable Kurdish controlled northeast, Assad controls most of Syria, except for a few pockets. That’s why I among many can’t figure out why Assad even used chemical weapons as his other weapons already seemed to be bringing the rebels to heel in the city of Douma, south of Damascus.
Why tug on Super Man’s cape, when unnecessary? Trump was looking for a total exit of Syria only two weeks ago, before some advisers prompted him to think about it. Why give him more reason to keep our forces in the area? Was it Assad’s arrogance? A joy in snubbing his nose at us? A curious stupidity?
In any case, I’m glad we had a well measured response to those chemical attacks (reportedly the new Secretary of State John Bolton, a long time hawk, pushed to do more damage and trigger more danger, but Mattis prevailed). However, the chest thumping from Trump and his subordinates, like foremost toady VP Pence, is unwarranted. They act as if he had just won a war.
Yes, we pushed back on the use of chemical weapons, for many decades banned internationally, and that is good. But it basically was an instance of military theater. By concentrating only on chemical weapons, we seemed to be saying all other weapons are fair game in Syria. You stay away from chemical weapons and we’ll stay away from you.
Thousands upon thousands have been killed by the forces of Assad, Russia and Iran, mostly with other types of weapons, such as barrel bombs. I guess the visuals aren’t as gut wrenching as seeing small children gasping for last breaths. We’re not committed to preventing deaths in Syria, just the ones that look the most gruesome on TV. Otherwise Trump can’t wait to get out.
So, when I hear various Trump spokespeople sound tough, talking about us being “locked and loaded” in case the Syrians dare use chemical weapons again, it is surreal like much that emanates from the Trump administration.
Why would they provoke more attacks from us, when Assad and his friends have plenty of other ways to kill and maim and destroy? And we’ve provided a green light to use them.