In case you aren’t aware of who Gordon Sondland is, let the Washington Post clue you in:
“A key figure in this week’s impeachment hearings will be Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union. His testimony on Nov. 20 will be highly scrutinized because his account, in small and large ways, has been contradicted by testimony of many other witnesses.
Already, Sondland has provided a supplemental declaration expanding on his initial deposition, saying his memory had been “refreshed” after reading the opening statements of others.”
As more conflicting testimonies have come to the fore, Sondland has even more to explain or to suddenly “recall” more clearly. His squirming between his previous statements and what he might now say, sure seems likely to interest. And may illuminate………….
P. S. – If you want a detailed explanation of Sondland’s inconsistencies, go to the Washington Post.
P. S. 2 – Just a reminder that there is another Democratic game of candidate survivor Wednesday night. There are still ten candidates on the stage and another two new ones in the wings, figuratively, so I won’t be watching. With that many, there is not likely much debating to break out in the midst of the food fight.
I’ll eat up the crumbs on the news to follow.
I wish the Dem leadership would stop calling all these candidates an “embarrassment of riches.” The fact that there are so many of them suggests none of them is a great candidate, as the recent addition of two more further implies.