T’was the week before Christmas and all through the House the two parties argued as one might with one’s spouse……… Thank God, that’s over with. The best news is the Senate won’t be taking up the articles until January and arguing some more, so we all get a reprieve for a few days to enjoy the holidays.
Just to be clear. While there has been much anti-Trump sentiment (count me in), the Democrats were actually forced into impeachment mode by Trump’s regularly flouting the rule of law. The case of Ukraine finally being too much to tolerate, once the whistle blower blew the whistle on that July 25 phone call where Trump pressured the Ukraine president for a personal “favor” in exchange for military assistance (Of course Trump denies this, and I will return to the matter after Christmas).
I think the Dem’s have made a good case. However, I have to give Trump’s minions credit for doing a great job of muddling the issue, making this all seem a matter of violating due process as opposed to whether selling out the national interest for personal political gain qualifies as a high crime.
And they probably helped Trump’s cause by dragging out the procedures through needless vote counts and repetitive accusations of how rotten the whole process was. I say it probably helped Trump because I believe the tiresome nature of this endless hearing process will more likely be blamed on the Democrats who, one has to admit, have brought it all about.
The Republicans want us only to look at the flaws in the process and not Trump’s actual wrong doing. If you’ve been paying attention, you know Republicans have done little to defend Trump’s actions per se, but instead incessantly attacking the impeachment process itself, its unfairness to him.
Since, except for a couple suggestions, the constitution leaves vague what might constitute a high crime, we the citizens can decide for ourselves. I’d say one high crime for a president is to put his personal interests over that of the nation, as Trump has clearly done in regards to Ukraine. That fits under the abuse of power article by common sense. That abuse is a political crime not a legal one.
But the constitution does not insist on a crime in a legal sense be committed. Even the Republicans who argue the impeachment is unfair and something the Democrats have wanted to do since the beginning of time, do not spend much time defending the president’s actions regarding Ukraine.
A few Republicans have dared to suggest it was bad judgement on Trump’s part, though not worthy of impeachment. However, Trump has squelched that kind of talk, clinging to the notion that his July 25 phone call was “perfect”.
Actually, despite hours and hours of hearings, there has been very little defense of the president’s actions compared to attacks on the impeachment process and those who provided evidence unsupportive of the president, usually people with impeccable credentials like Maria Yovanovich, the ambassador to Ukraine who Trump removed, because she was corrupt according to Rudi Giuliani, which actually means she tried to thwart Giuliani’s corrupt efforts (another topic I will come back to later).
Finally, another article I would consider – which might just fit under the abuse of power article – is the steady dismantling and ignoring of our rule of law, and the pillars that support it, calling the press the “enemy of the people”, and labeling our foreign service and intelligence communities, especially the FBI, members of the “deep state,” which apparently grows with each person who irritates him.
Don’t know how FBI director Chris Wray is doing, but Trump must still be stewing about his recent public statement that the FBI has no evidence that Ukraine impacted the 2016 election. The president certainly must be contemplating a replacement, as that undermines his Ukraine conspiracy theory.
I could go on and on, but I’ll give you a break and stop now.
SEE YOU NEXT YEAR….if not before.