Get Mueller to Testify and Then Let’s Consider Impeachment

I still stick with Speaker Polosi’s insistence on a slow go to impeach Trump believing, like her, that first more Americans need to be persuaded of Trump’s unfitness for the presidency before they will favor impeachment.

Ari Melber, one of the sharper analysts at MSNBC, got to the heart of the awareness problem:  He has said:  “Mueller brought a book to a twitter fight.”  The four-word tweet has won the battle of narratives over the painstaking 448 pages of the book.  In a world of mind numbing information, we gravitate towards the simplest “truths”.

To combat Trump’s distorted mantra of “no collusion, no obstruction” it is essential for Special Counsel Mueller to testify before Congress.  Even if he just reads from his report.  Seeing him actually saying those words is a big step beyond hearing others restate them.  Fairly or not, Mueller’s integrity it rated much higher than the media who cover him.

A book cannot beat a twitter mantra, but TV, or a movie, can at least give the Dems a chance to square the narrative.  Americans want to see the movie rather than read the book.  That’s pretty much what we are as a nation now.  So many distractions, work wise or pleasure wise, that hardly anyone reads serious books anymore.   Including me (except for works of history that read like fiction.)

A TV show still can get our attention, thus the necessity for Mueller to testify on TV.  It would be best if he did so voluntarily, but he has been so adamant about staying clear of politics that he has yet to show that willingness.  He believes the report says everything needed.  He doesn’t seem to see that pointing to a book is no longer the right way to present the report.

The Democratically controlled  House Judicial Committee seems hopeful he will see the necessity for him to reiterate the message publicly, but he might need to be subpoenaed to do so.   I have no doubt he would comply with a subpoena, given his allegiance to law and order, just the opposite of the president.

It would help a lot if McGahn, Trump’s former White House attorney would testify, too.  He is quoted often in the Mueller report describing Trump’s attempts at obstruction and I’d like to hear his voice at least repeating some of it on TV, but so far he has fought a subpoena at Trump’s behest.   Odd, in that Trump has called his quoted statements lies.

Hope Hicks, Trump’s former long time personal assistant is actually supposed to testify to Congress tomorrow, Wednesday, in a closed door session.   But I think she will dodge questions where she can given her closeness to Trump.

Mueller, McGahn and Hicks would make a nice trifecta if they all fully testify, but Mueller is the most important.  Fortunately, he is also the one who can be most counted upon to testify.

I just hope it is sooner rather than later.

Advertisements

Trump is Driving Me Crazy and the Trip gets Shorter each Day

Not exactly, but with all the thoughts he prompts with his outrageous distortions, he produces  outrage fatigue, lying so often and changing his tune so frequently, everything blurs together.  He has taken us past a “post truth” politics to a post reality politics.

If you haven’t been driven totally nuts, you may have noticed how the boy who would be king said in an interview there was nothing wrong with receiving information from foreign agents, it just being more opposition research.

He changed his tune a couple of times at least, after even a couple of Republican senators gently chided Trump for basically saying to all the world, send us your dirt on my opponents.  The last version I heard was his claiming in front of the three nodding heads on Fox and Friends that of course he would notify the FBI, because no one loves America more than he does.

I could go on and on, but that would clearly get me closer to the loony bin and prevent me from writing at all.   I just want to make this point, a suggestion as to how to interpret Trump’s words.   Whatever he says, just flip it to the opposite.   So, when Trump says “no one loves America more” than he does, just switch the “more ” to “less”.

He cares so much about himself, there can’t be much love left for the rest of us.

And when he says “believe me”, as he often does, translate it into “don’t believe me”.  And if he says it twice, really don’t believe him.  When he says he has solved a problem, it really is he hasn’t solved the problem:  he just wants us to think so, like in the case of North Korea and its nukes.   Remember how he said after that first meeting with his bosom buddy Kim Jung Un that we could sleep easier because the nuclear threat was gone?

Not only is it not gone, it is undiminished, and is likely even stronger.  But no problem, president deranged Don still believes in Kim Jung Un, and his own ability to sway him.

I just can’t wait till he tells us how he has solved the Iran problem.

Deconstructing “Don the Con”. Why Nancy Pelosi is My Hero.

In my April 29 post I backed Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s approach of “one step at a time” regarding the possible impeachment of president Trump.  I continue to applaud her tight rope walking skills between Trump, media commentators and party activists who claim the moral necessity of impeaching him right now.  As a matter of principle.  Even Trump likes the idea, but for unprincipled reasons of course.

For those who do not recognize the wisdom of her ways, Speaker Pelosi knows it would be foolish to go the impeachment route right now because there is a lack of outcry from Americans for it.  It is not for the House to demand it, but the American people.   Right now the outcry is below 50%, with a plurality of those all important “independents” being against it in a May 9 poll.  To prompt more outcry a slow pealing of the onion  of Trump’s fabrications must take place.  A course we might title:  Deconstructing Don the Con.

As Speaker Pelosi has often asserted, Trump wants the Dems to launch impeachment hearings because that would fit his narrative of victimization which he could then cap off with Republicans in the Senate rejecting the measure.  One more rationale for Trump to proclaim his innocence and decry all that wasted time, as we approach the 2020 election.

Pelosi is not saying never move to impeachment.  Only move to it as a final act after all other avenues have been exhausted while educating the American public in the process.  Let’s hope Robert Mueller will testify soon.  And let the House committees finish their investigations and a number of Trump’s phony court cases get rejected.  Also let’s see what happens when the New York legislature directs Trump’s state tax statements to the House committees.   Whatever is useful to educate the American public.

Some anti-Trumpers would argue that at least an “impeachment inquiry” could be launched for a start.  It sounds good, but to the general public there is no difference between an impeachment inquiry and impeachment itself.  And the notion of impeachment only fires up the already fervent at this time.

That’s why Nancy keeps pressing the point of finding out the facts and going where they lead, rather than talking of impeachment.   The “facts” don’t have a negative connotation as “impeachment” has right now given the mental fatigue of living in “investigation nation”.

The goal is to keep marshaling facts until the picture becomes so clear that the balance of American political opinion shifts in favor of impeachment.   The American people need to demand it, not just the Democratically controlled House of Representatives.

This Crap of Reporters Allowing Trump to Mislead, Fabricate, or Just Plain Lie Must Stop!

Having posted yesterday, I was not eager to do so again so soon, but I’m so mad watching a Trump so-called press conference provide this morning a platform for Trump to spew his twisted narrative of events, I just have to.

PRESS PEOPLE:   You know that this is happening, that he bats your feckless questions away or employs them to bring up another distortion or lie.  Then after his “speech” you sit in groups and analyze much of what he says as if any of it can be taken seriously, as if he won’t come up with something completely different later today or tomorrow.  Depending on the wisdom of his gut.

The guy has no respect for the truth, so why believe anything he says.

What you are doing is providing this scoundrel with yet another platform for his fabricated narrative.   His propaganda.  Hey, I am empathetic.  I don’t have any marvelous suggestions.  I just know Trump has beaten you at the traditional journalistic game and you need to stop playing that game and create a new one.

Maybe like a labor union you can go on strike.  In your case making a group statement that you will not attend these charade sessions any more unless you can challenge Trump (and his mouthpieces) on his lies.   Of course, he wouldn’t allow that……………………

…..so what’s next?  I don’t know.  That’s your job to figure it out.

Still Waiting for Mueller to Testify to Congress

The Trump extravaganza of issues keeps expanding exponentially, but short of a noteworthy military conflict, I’m still most concerned if and when Special Counsel Robert Mueller will testify to Congress.  I’ve heard May 15 bandied about for a testimony date, but nothing from Mueller about that.

At the moment, my sense is Trump is winning the message game, asserting that the report’s lack of indictments clear the president.  From what I’ve gleaned from many who have read the report, the actual picture is much less flattering.  Even incriminating if you believe over 700 federal prosecutors who have signed a joint letter to that effect.

But we need Mueller to testify in order to substantiate that, as well as showing Attorney General Barr has misinterpreted the findings to the public.  Which in turn has allowed Republicans to parrot it’s a done deal.  Let’s move on.

Linked here is a story from CBS news that delve’s into the question of whether Trump can stop Mueller from testifying once he leaves office (no public date set yet).

I would say the basic conclusion is that while Trump might be able to limit Mueller’s comments to only what he said in the report on the basis of executive privilege, even that argument might not prevail.  In any case, it looks like it comes down to Mueller’s willingness to testify and I can only hope he wants to set the record straight enough to overcome his preference to remain out of the public eye.

Theatre of the Absurd: The Trumped Up Border Crisis

It’s a new year but the only thing new about the president is his willingness to place even more weight on the phony facts he and his rabid right wing cohorts, like Anne Coulter and Rush Limbaugh, have made up.

Some of these “alternative facts” support the idea that we now need a southern border wall so much that Trump has been willing to shut down much of the federal government for weeks, displacing hundreds of thousands of workers and weakening key services in hopes the Democrats will submit to his demands for wall funding.

That’s Trump’s idea of deal making:  You succumb to his demands or get blamed for an unwillingness to negotiate.

Trump hasn’t acted like the wall was an emergency through his first two years in office.  It’s an emergency now because the likes of Limbaugh and Coulter are calling him a phony for failing to act.  Since he can’t get his way with Congress,  calling the building of a wall an emergency may be his only way to escape the box he has placed himself in.

The matter would likely head straight to the courts, the government could be reopened and Trump can tell Rush and Anne and his base in general he really tried.

We don’t need a southern wall.  Trump needs one to quiet his critical supporters.  The Democrats are right to refuse to succumb, for the wall makes no sense.

Here are a few of facts from government sources that undermine his arguments for a wall:

1)  The overwhelming quantity of drugs come across the border at points of entry not through the wilderness that Trump wants to fence off.  Better search methods are needed, not a fence.

2)   Despite Trump’s claim of thousands of terrorist suspects coming across the southern border, federal government reports suggest it was more like six in the first half of 2018.  Yes, six.  Forty-some came across the northern border that nobody talks about.   Should we build a wall there, too?  And first?

3)  Most foreign terrorist suspects come into the country legally and then just overstay their visas.

4)  Since 9/11, the large majority of terrorists attacks in the U. S. have come from home grown types who have become radicalized not from foreigners infiltrating our borders.

Certainly we could use better border security, not to mention a more humane way of treating  the large increase of those simply seeking political asylum, but Trump’s wall seems to address none of these issues.  It is a fake answer to our real border problems, not only a wasted effort but one that distracts from real needs to be addressed.

The five billion or so dollars he is demanding to start the wall is really, just a start.  Estimates from 40 to 80 billion or more have been made for the total cost.  So, this fake answer to a phony problem is also going to cost us a fortune.

By the way, I watched a clip of Trump at the border being given a briefing by border security.  The officer was showing slides of a tunnel they recently discovered under a section of the wall already built.  Trump just sat there nodding as if unaware the border agent had just provided one more tunnel undermining his argument for a wall.

No matter to him.  It is all a Trump fabrication to shore up his base with a false solution to a mischaracterized problem.

 

 

Bye Bye Judge Kavanaugh

Dear Judge Kavanaugh,

While I do realize your impending demise is hardly a laughing matter, I’m flippant in my title because you brought this personal tragedy on by creating a false choir boy image of yourself in high school and college, a self-portrait that has plenty of holes already reported.  I will be surprised if the FBI does not come up with more this week, even though I fear their efforts will be severely curtailed by White House restrictions as to what are “current credible accusations.”

Your Achilles heel is you drank much more in your teen years than you admit to.  There are several reports to that effect along with the confessional book (titled Wasted) by one of your high school pals, Mark Judge, who describes often drinking back then to the point of “annihilation”.   If he did it often, are we to believe you never got blottoed, never had a at least one memory black out?  You keep insisting on your purity in this regard.  You are clinging to that story like a life vest, but it is really a huge stone.

It is not your teen drinking but your lying about it that will bring you down.  G. W. Bush was a problem drinker, but stopped and did not hide his past.   It is your pinning your integrity on a lie that is going to sink you, even if conclusive evidence of sexual molestation isn’t established this week.

If you will steadfastly lie about this what else might you lie about?

You seemed particularly irked when Democrat senators pushed you on this point of never blacking out, at one point petulantly asking your questioner if she had ever blacked out.   (by the way, petulance is not a good look for an aspiring Supreme court judge…..just saying).

While some of your expressions of anger seemed real, your furious reactions to questions on your drinking excessively seemed more the self-righteous delusion woven by a liar who feels above being questioned.  I recall star pitcher Roger Clemens when he furiously denied the use of steroids to a congressional committee, as if the committee was not giving him his just due for all of his accomplishments.  How dare you question my integrity?  Later he was convicted on several charges of perjury.

For many of us Christine Blasey Ford’s “incredibly credible” testimony was confirmation enough that you should not be confirmed, given the fact she had nothing to gain and much to lose in coming forth.  Your defense against her accusations is that you are too nice, on the one hand, and on the other, you have never drank so much in your entire life as to black out and not remember.

I understand.  You feel you have done so much good over the years since, that it is unfair for this to be brought up, and up, and up again…….  You feel you have earned this spot on the Supreme Court, and all these Democrats want to talk about is your behavior as a teen.   So what if I drank too much back then.  Look at what I have become.  That’s what is important.

But judge, your accomplishments do not erase this lie which you continue to tell.  Even if sexual misconduct is not established this week, what the FBI calls a “lack of candor” figures to haunt you.  The choir boy lie combined with your petulant conspiracy laden defense Thursday and Christine Blasey Ford’s indelible testimony figure to prompt at least a few on-the-fence senators  to tip the vote against you.  And it will only take a couple of the in-betweeners to vote no.

You have said this hearing has “destroyed your life.”  Sadly, I think it may be true, but look long in the mirror before pinning the fatal fault on everyone but you.