It has been a week since I mentioned the international talks on Syria in Munich noting “there is a ray of hope now regarding a cease fire in Aleppo, the delivery of humanitarian aid to thousands and a continuation of talks aimed at an eventual peace deal.”
As for a cease fire in Aleppo, there has been none. Syrian governmental troops and Russian planes are still pounding that city and there seems no reason to believe that will halt. Syrian president Assad and the Russians call any forces that fight the regime terrorists, including rebels we support, so any peace deal is hard to imagine working. Also, Assad recently said he planned to fight on until all of Syria is brought under government control again, another nail in the coffin of peace prospects.
The most positive outcome of the Munich talks is that humanitarian relief has begun to reach thousands of people trapped and starving in various pockets of Syria. Though those reached will be a fraction of hundreds of thousands in such situations, it is one positive outcome from the talks.
I could add that there are plans for further talks in Geneva by the various nations represented in Munich, most notably ourselves and the Russians, but ones scheduled today in Geneva have fallen through, for no clear reason and even with differing reports as to whether they have been cancelled or just postponed.
Check out this article in the Washington Post for more on that curious front.
It should be noted, however, that a number of knowledgeable observers are sharply critical of the talks, seeing them as just an ongoing excuse for the U. S. doing little while the Syrian government continues to strengthen its position aided by Russia and Iran.
A more aggressive policy by the U. S. raises the possibility of our conflicting militarily with Russia and the potential for unforeseen, world shattering consequences. Our present course of muddling along is hard to embrace as well.
For myself, the presidential candidate I think might best serve to guide us though these troubled waters is the one I’ll likely vote for.
For casual observers as most of us are, it is difficult just to sort out the various fighting factions and where they are in Syria. An article in the The Guardian from the UK describes the initial humanitarian efforts while showing a map of Syria useful in trying to get a grasp of this nearly incomprehensible situation fraught with international consequences.
I tried to link you to it, but cannot, so you will need to apply the cut-and-paste method.