Or is it swirling around down the rabbit hole? Or toilet. Choose a metaphor for how off balanced, how out of sorts, how discombobulated only three weeks of a Trump presidency has wrought. Really? Only three weeks? OMG! I don’t know if I can hold on for four years of this.
I feel the need to say something while questioning whether it is useful to say anything? Since we cannot depend on Trump sticking to anything he says why do we spend so much time talking about all that he says? The Trump administration brings to mind Macbeth’s reflection on life as “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
I imagine there is significance here or there, but it is a moving target that might turn around and shoot back. Today’s biggest news flash is El Presidente finally recognizing a well established foreign policy doctrine that states mainland China is the “China” with Taiwan but a prodigal part, an unquestioned U.S. position for 38 years. Until Trump indicated that was on the table along with the rest of our foreign policy.
So, today Trump officially recognized China. Whoopi!
A TV talking head called this a “sign of rationality”. This is what qualifies as news in Wacky-land. But it is news because people around the world have been unsettled by what policy Trump would have towards China, especially the Chinese. In this one case, we can count on normalcy, at least for now, today. A raft of international relief in an ocean of uncertainty.
What about all the rest of our foreign policies? Will we know what they are by the end of Trump’s term? A jerry-rigged foreign policy will keep ’em guessing. That’s what Trump likes.
Another news story today is that Jerod Kushner, Trump son-in-law and virtual ambassador at large, had chats with the Mexican foreign minister about The Wall, our shared economy and (who knows?) Ivanka’s clothing line? The last-named is another hot topic today as special counsel Kellyanne Conway raised ethics flags by suggesting from the White House that viewers buy some of Ivanka’s clothes.
Untraditional foreign policy conducted by whomever and conflicts of interest seem likely to be daily reportorial fare. While that would make sense in a normal presidency, I think they are largely distractions in this one. I don’t believe a majority of Americans really care about these things right now. Even non-Trumpeteers don’t care because there is too much else to care about.
Trump supporters especially do not care and the more carefully argued the attacks on Trump for such things, the less they listen. They want the story simple as Trump tells it. To them complication is obfuscation.
The travel ban Trump has rolled out like a car with four flat tires still appears to keep his promise to increase our protection from terrorism, even though the so-called plan is mostly a show as I argued in my last post and, I would add, heartless. But it is Trump doing what he said and no matter how this turns out he will portray himself as a winner, or at least a victim of foul play. A should be winner.
That’s enough babbling on.
It may be best to take the long view as expressed by Stephen Hadley, the national security adviser for President George W. Bush: “Trump is an insurgent president leading a populist movement. He came in with an agenda that was disruptive and destructive — throw over the money changers’ tables. The next six months will see destruction, some of it creative and some just destructive. The question is what Trump will want to build after that.”
I wonder what will be left when we get to the “after that”.